Epson EpiqVision LS800 review

An ultra short throw built for brightness rather than colour purity, and why that trade suits most living rooms.

The verdict: The LS800 is the ultra short throw to buy when the room is genuinely bright, because it prioritises light output over everything else and sits closer to the wall than almost anything in the category. Buy it for a sunlit living room where a triple laser projector still washes out. Buy the Hisense PX3-PRO if colour matters more to you than raw brightness, because a laser phosphor light source cannot match three separate lasers for saturation.

Brightest ultra short throw

Epson EpiqVision LS800 4K PRO-UHD Ultra Short Throw Laser Projector

~$2,700

A very bright ultra short throw laser projector with an extremely short throw ratio and integrated Yamaha-designed audio.

Check price on Amazon

Specifications

Spec	Detail
Light source	Laser phosphor
Type	Ultra short throw
Resolution	4K PRO-UHD via pixel shifting
Throw	Among the shortest in the category, sits very close to the wall
Audio	Integrated sound system

Specifications above come from Epson's published specifications. Treat pricing as approximate, since Amazon pricing moves.

What it does well

Exceptional brightness, which is the specification that actually decides whether an ultra short throw works in a real living room.
An extremely short throw ratio, so it sits closer to the wall than most rivals and fits shallower furniture.
Integrated audio good enough that it can genuinely function as a television replacement without a soundbar on day one.
Epson's colour handling is well judged for bright content, where saturation would otherwise be the first casualty.

Where it falls short

Laser phosphor rather than triple laser, so colour gamut does not reach what the Hisense and AWOL units cover. In saturated content this is visible side by side.
It still needs an ambient light rejecting screen. Brightness alone does not fix contrast, and projecting onto a wall wastes much of what you paid for.
Pixel shifting rather than native 4K.
Black levels in a darkened room are well behind a conventional long throw projector, which is the trade the whole category makes.

What owners report

Brightness is what owners consistently report as the deciding factor, particularly people who tried a dimmer ultra short throw first and returned it. The very short throw ratio comes up often too, from owners whose furniture simply could not accommodate a projector that needed to sit further out.

The recurring criticism is colour compared with triple laser rivals, usually from people who compared them directly. Owners who did not compare rarely raise it. The integrated audio is praised more than integrated projector audio usually is.

Who it suits

Bright living rooms where other ultra short throws have disappointed.
Shallow media units where throw distance is the binding constraint.
Buyers who want a television replacement that works out of the box.

Who should skip it

Colour-critical viewers, who should look at a triple laser unit.
Anyone with a dedicated dark room, where a long throw projector gives far better contrast for the money.
Buyers unwilling to add an ALR screen.

Alternatives worth considering

Better Colour

Hisense PX3-PRO Ultra Short Throw Triple Laser Projector

~$2,800

Three separate lasers cover far more of the colour space than laser phosphor, and saturated content is where you see it. Slightly less bright, so in the most punishing rooms the Epson still wins.

Check price on Amazon

Buy This Too

Elite Screens Aeon CLR3 123 inch ALR Fixed Frame Screen

~$1,300

Required rather than optional. An ultra short throw projector without a ceiling light rejecting screen gives up most of the contrast that justifies the purchase.

Check price on Amazon

Common questions

Is the LS800 bright enough for a sunlit room?

It is among the brightest ultra short throw projectors available, which is its main reason to exist. Paired with an ambient light rejecting screen it stays watchable in conditions where dimmer units do not. In direct sunlight falling on the screen, no projector wins.

Laser phosphor or triple laser: does it matter?

For colour, yes. Triple laser uses separate red, green and blue sources and covers a wider gamut, which shows in saturated content. Laser phosphor uses a blue laser through a phosphor wheel, which is generally brighter for the money. Choose brightness for a bright room, colour for a controlled one.

Do I still need an ALR screen with a projector this bright?

Yes. Brightness raises the whole image including the black level; an ALR screen is what rejects the room light that is lifting the blacks. The two solve different halves of the same problem and you want both.

Can it replace my television entirely?

For most households, yes, with an ALR screen and given it has usable integrated audio. Where it will not is a room with uncontrolled direct sunlight on the screen, or for a viewer who cares deeply about black level in dark films.

Keep reading

This review draws on published specifications, manufacturer figures and the consensus of verified owner reviews. We have not tested this product ourselves, and we say so rather than implying otherwise. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.